AIM records AI-assisted work, but teams need a clear way to understand what changed, why it changed and who approved the next step.
Please answer from your own work:
1. Where does this issue appear?
2. What would a useful change look like?
3. What should AIM avoid changing?
4. What evidence should we collect?
SCAMPER lens: Put to another use — where else could this create value?
Charlie AI helper:
### Members-only interview: Explaining AI-created changes
**Approved activity:** AIM records AI-assisted work. Teams need a clear explanation of what changed, why it changed and who approved the next step.
1. What should Charlie include in a short change summary so your team knows what happened and what’s approved next?
2. Where else could that record be useful—for example, onboarding, handovers or reviewing decisions?
3. Choose one of those uses: what would you add or remove to make the record practical for that audience?
